top of page

AI for Editors Blog

Education, News & Resources about
Artificial Intelligence in Editing

A skill is a saved set of plain-language instructions that teaches Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini to do one task the same way every time. For copyeditors, substantive editors, and other types of editors, that means you build a prompt once and use it on every job, with no coding.


Open purple suitcase with neon green gears on a white-and-purple podium against a dark purple cloud backdrop.

Table of Contents

 

If you’ve used AI for editing for a while, you probably have a library of prompts that work. Every time you need one, you find it, paste it, and tweak it for the new project.

 

Skills end that routine. You save your instructions once, and your AI tool follows them the same way on every job. Building one doesn’t take code, either. It takes what editors already have: clear directions, good examples, and a sense of what to leave alone.

 

AI Skills for Editors: Key Takeaways

  • A skill is a saved set of plain-language instructions for one task you repeat.

  • Use a prompt for one-off tasks. Use a skill for anything you do every week.

  • The easiest way to build one is to test a prompt until it works, then ask your AI tool to turn it into a skill.

  • Test each skill on documents you know well before you rely on it.


What Is a Skill in Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini?

In Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, a skill is a saved set of instructions that tells the AI how to do one specific task. You write the instructions once, and the AI follows them whenever the task comes up.

 

I think of a skill as a prompt suitcase. You pack it once, carefully, and then you can take it wherever you go. In Claude, for example, the same skill works in a chat, inside a project, and in the Claude for Word sidebar.

 

Behind the scenes, a skill is a folder with:


  • Instruction File: one file, named SKILL.md, written in plain language

  • Reference Files (Optional): supporting documents the skill reads when it runs, such as a word list, a style guide section, or examples

 

A skill loads only when it’s needed. To call it yourself, type / in Claude or Gemini, or @ in ChatGPT, followed by the name of the skill. The AI can also use it on its own when your request matches the skill’s description.


How Is a Skill Different from a Prompt?

A prompt is a one-time request you type or paste into a chat. A skill is a saved set of instructions the AI reuses every time the same task comes up. Here’s how the two compare:

Feature

Prompt

Skill

What it covers

one request

one task, whenever it comes up

How long it lasts

one chat

until you turn it off or delete it

How you use it

paste or type it each time

call it by name, or let the AI choose it

Best for

one-off tasks and quick edits

repeatable procedures with rules and reference files

 

What Editing Tasks Can a Skill Handle?

Many editing tasks you repeat can become a skill, from rule-based work like applying house style to judgment calls, such as spotting claims that overpromise. These tasks usually fall into one of three categories:


  • Checks: These scan for one kind of problem and fix or flag it. Examples include cross-references, defined terms, brand guidelines, house style, continuity, repeated words, and missing steps in instructions.

  • Writes: These draft new text in a set format, based on your rules and samples. Examples include alt text, executive summaries, editorial letters, author queries, back-cover copy, press releases, and meeting summaries.

  • Converts: These apply a known set of changes across a whole document. Examples include US to UK spelling and punctuation, one reference style to another (such as APA to Chicago), and dense text to plain language.

 

Checks are a good first skill to build. You can set one to flag issues without touching the text or to make its fixes as tracked changes. Either way, you make the final call. In my Claude for Word Workshop, for example, students use skills that check cross-references, catch repeated words, and find continuity errors.


What Are the Parts of a Skill?

Most good editing skills have five parts:


  1. Name: Give the skill a short name that explains what it does, such as “audience-difficulty-check.”

  2. Description: Say what the skill does and when to use it. Include the specific words you’d use to ask for it, such as “check the cross-references,” because the AI reads the description to decide when to run the skill on its own.

  3. The Job: List the steps in order. Say what to look for, how to judge it, and which reference files to use.

  4. Leave Alone: Name what the skill shouldn’t change or flag, such as quotations, spellings the author has approved, or problems outside the skill’s job. This prevents false alarms and keeps the skill from drifting into other tasks.

  5. What to Give Back: Describe what you want back and in what form, such as a numbered list in a chat, comments in a document, or tracked changes. Include details like how long each note should be and whether to quote the passage.


Fix It or Flag It?

“What to Give Back” is where you decide how much the AI touches your text. My rule: Fix it when there’s one right answer. Flag it when there isn’t. “Mississipi” should be “Mississippi,” so that’s a fix. A dose given as “500 mg” in the text but “50 mg” in a table is a question for the author, so that’s a flag.

 

What that looks like depends on where you work:

 

  • In a Chat: a corrected version of the text, plus a list of questions for the author

  • In a Document: tracked changes for the fixes and comments for everything else

 

In my Claude for Word Workshop, I call this Two-Channel Editing. Two-Channel Editing means the AI fixes clear-cut errors as tracked changes and flags judgment calls as comments. You can add it to almost any skill or prompt.

 

Example Instruction for Fixing vs. Flagging:

Fix it when a rule gives one correct answer. Flag it instead when more than one answer could be right, when you’re unsure, or when only the author can decide.


Sample Skill: Audience Difficulty Check

Here’s a short skill you can copy and adapt. It finds and flags the passages a document’s readers are most likely to struggle with.


To use this skill: Copy it, paste it into a new chat in Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini, and type “Save this as a skill.” Review what the AI creates, then save it. To upload it as a file instead, paste it into a plain-text editor (not Word) and save it as SKILL.md.



---
name: audience-difficulty-check
description: Identifies a document's intended audience and flags the passages that audience is most likely to find hard to understand. Use when an editor asks whether a document fits its readers. Flags only. Never changes the text.
---

# Audience Difficulty Check

## The Job
1. Read the whole document. Identify the intended audience from the document itself, or use the audience the editor names.
2. Find the passages most likely to be hard for that audience, such as undefined terms, assumed background knowledge, or dense sentences.
3. For each passage, explain in one to three sentences what makes it hard for this audience.

## Leave Alone
- Don't change any text.
- Don't comment on grammar, spelling, or style.
- Don't claim more about the audience than the document supports.

## What to Give Back
- In a chat: a numbered list of passages, each with a short quotation and the reason it's hard.
- In a document: a comment on each passage. No tracked changes.
- End with one or two sentences naming the audience you identified.

How Do You Add a Skill?

Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini give you two ways to add a skill:


  • Build It in a Chat: Ask the AI to create the skill. Review what it builds, then save it.

  • Upload a File: Open the Skills page in your tool and upload the skill file someone shared with you.


A skill file must be a Markdown (.md) file. If a colleague shares one as a Word document or Google Doc, convert it to .md before you upload it.


Skills may require a paid plan or require you to turn on a setting first. For current step-by-step instructions, see the help page for Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini.


How Do You Turn a Prompt into a Skill?

Start with a prompt you already use. (New to prompting? Read How to Write and Refine AI Editing Prompts to Get the Best Results.) Then:


  1. Test your idea as a prompt. Run it on a real document.

  2. Adjust the prompt until the AI does exactly what you want.

  3. Ask the AI to build a skill from the prompt that works.

  4. Test the skill, and revise it as needed.

 

For example, here’s the prompt that became the sample skill above:

 

Example Prompt for an Audience Check:

 


Who seems to be the intended audience of this document? Identify the sections most likely to be hard for [audience] to understand. For each, explain why and include a link to the passage. Don’t make any changes.

Once a prompt works, ask the AI to convert it to a skill. The AI writes the description and the instruction file (the file named SKILL.md) for you.

 

Example Prompt for Building a Skill:

 


Convert this prompt into a skill. The goal is [what the skill should do]. Leave alone [what it shouldn’t touch]. Success looks like [what a good result includes]. Here’s the prompt: [paste your tested prompt]

Read what it builds before you save it. But don’t overthink your first skill. Make it small, give it one job, and revise it later.


How Much Should You Trust a Skill?

No skill is guaranteed to catch every issue. Clear, specific instructions get you most of the way there, and a well-built skill can hold up on long documents. That is important because AI tools are more likely to miss things as documents get longer.

 

When I ran a skill that flags material that may need permission on a 179-page document, it caught every item, including song lyrics, a reproduced recipe, an excerpt from a copyrighted book, and brand names that could raise trademark questions. A person reading that many pages could easily miss one. Still, a skill gives you a first pass, not a final one: You decide what to do about each flag.

 

To build trust in a skill:


  • Test on documents you know well. Run a new skill on a document whose problems you already know. Run it more than once to see whether the results stay consistent.

  • Keep it to one task. Narrow skills give more reliable results.

  • Add to the leave-alone list. When a skill flags things it shouldn’t, tell it what to skip.


Final Thoughts

A skill can sound like a tool for developers, but building one draws on what editors already do well: writing clear instructions, giving good examples, and knowing what to leave alone.

 

Start with one small skill for a task you do every week. Test it, adjust it, and save it. The AI applies your rules. You still make the final calls.



AI tools evolve quickly—their features, pricing, and data policies can change without much fanfare. The specifics in this article were accurate at publication. Before making decisions based on any tool mentioned here, check its website directly.

 

Want help building skills and other reusable AI tools? In Building AI Assistants, you’ll turn your editorial rules into tools you can use in ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, with no coding. If you edit in Word, the Claude for Word Workshop shows you how to build a Claude skill that edits with tracked changes and comments.


 


photo of Erin Servais

Erin Servais is the founder of the AI for Editors courses, the first AI training program built specifically for editorial professionals. Since launching it in August 2023, she has trained editors and content professionals from more than 20 countries, including people from Big Five publishers, Ivy League universities, US government and United Nations agencies, and major tech companies. She has presented on AI in content development for the Book Industry Study Group, the University of Chicago, the UNC–Chapel Hill School of Journalism and Media, and the ConVEx conference, and she has written about AI and editing for the Editorial Freelancers Association and the Independent Book Publishers Association. Her work has been featured in Jane Friedman’s The Bottom Line and Mignon Fogarty’s AI Sidequest. A professional editor for more than 20 years, Erin is a former ACES board member and has taught copyediting at UC San Diego Extended Studies.

 

Have questions? Email Erin → erin@aiforeditors.com



 


Writer: Erin Servais
Erin Servais
May 5, 2025
9 min read

Updated: Oct 13

Open book on a purple-white platform with neon gears above, set against soft arched backgrounds in a clean, futuristic scene

Developmental editors can use AI tools like Claude and Gemini Notebook to streamline first-pass analysis, generate supplementary documents, and draft author feedback without compromising editorial judgment or integrity. This article explains how, with your first steps and example prompts.



Developmental editing is a complex task that requires strategic thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence, along with a deep understanding of genre conventions and the publishing industry. It’s no wonder we developmental editors tend to think highly of ourselves.


When the topic of Artificial Intelligence (AI) first entered our personal narratives, it made sense that many of us assumed the technology would not be capable of assisting with this demanding, cerebral higher level of editing.


As AI has become entrenched in writing and lower levels of editing, developmental editors now may be starting to ask:


  • Can a machine truly understand the nuances of a piece?

  • Will a bot render my hard-earned expertise into a bunch of algorithms?

  • Is there still a place for me—the human—in this new technological era?


It’s true that AI’s text extraction and analytical capabilities are well-suited to helping developmental editors with many job duties. This article lays out how to use AI for developmental editing in a way that complements your human skills and allows you to improve your efficiency without compromising your editorial judgment or integrity, which should never be replaced.


When a developmental editor uses AI to quickly identify a manuscript’s flaws, it frees up time to focus on creative solutions, resulting in higher-quality edits completed faster. Sounds too good to be true? It isn’t. Read on.


How Can AI Help Developmental Editors: Key Takeaways


  • Developmental editing tackles the big picture: structure, pacing, character arcs, and theme.

  • AI can slash your first-pass time and catch issues that might have slipped through.

  • AI analysis + your judgment and expertise = stronger editing completed in less time.


What Is AI Developmental Editing?

Developmental editing focuses on the “big picture” of a manuscript. That means analyzing the fundamentals:


  • Structure and pacing

  • Plot and character development

  • Theme and overall cohesion


Then synthesizing the analysis into suggestions that guide the writer to create a cohesive and engaging manuscript that readers will appreciate.


AI developmental editing includes all the same pieces, with one addition: AI tools to assist with analyzing, organizing, and brainstorming to reduce the manual workload.


When AI supports developmental editing, tasks are divided by capability: the AI does the tasks it can do best, and the human editor does the tasks only a human can do.


Why Use AI for Developmental Editing?

Imagine doing your job faster and easier. Then imagine doing your job faster, easier, and better. Incorporating AI into your editorial workflow opens the doors to real gains in efficiency and quality.


Here's what that looks like in practice:


  • Speed. AI tools can now analyze an entire book-length manuscript in one go, producing a chapter-by-chapter summary and a report of the main weaknesses you would have identified on your first pass—before you've read a single page. When you do start reading:

    • You will be more prepared than you’ve ever been.

    • You’ll have reserved all the hours you would have spent on your first read-through.

  • Quality. Think of AI like a colleague you can bounce ideas off of. It’s excellent at identifying content gaps, recognizing inconsistencies, and brainstorming ideas and solutions. Working with AI for developmental editing means:

    • Fewer subtle issues slip through the cracks.

    • You will have options to consider that you may not have thought of on your own.


Ready to add AI to your workflow? Here’s where to start: ...


How Can You Use AI for Developmental Editing?

There’s a place for AI at all stages of the developmental editing workflow, from pre-editing tasks to drafting feedback for authors. Here’s an overview of how to use AI in your work.


The first step is to choose the best AI tool in the toolbox. Good news! This decision got a lot easier.

A year or two into our AI era, only a handful of specialized tools could handle a full-length manuscript without you breaking it into chunks first. That's changed. Today, all the major AI chatbots—Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot—can take in an entire book-length document at once.


So the question is no longer can it handle my manuscript? It's which tool does the job best? For developmental editing, these three are worth your attention:


  • Claude (claude.ai) remains a favorite among editors for its accuracy and nuanced responses.

  • Gemini Notebook, formerly NotebookLM, (notebooklm.google.com) specializes at research and analysis—and it cites which exact page it pulled information from, making it easy to verify its work.

  • Gemini (gemini.google.com) is a strong all-around choice, especially if you're already in the Google ecosystem. It excels at deep research and complex analysis, such as regulatory compliance guides.


If you work primarily in Microsoft Word, it's worth exploring the AI tools that live directly inside Word. Copilot is useful for summarizing lengthy documents or suggesting style consistency improvements, and it now supports tracked changes natively, keeping your edits transparent and auditable the way editors expect. Claude for Word is another option worth a look. It's built specifically for document work, reading through multisection documents, working through comment threads, and revising while preserving your formatting, numbering, and styles. Like Copilot, it proposes edits as native tracked changes so you can review, accept, or reject each one, keeping the human editor in control.


Use AI to supercharge your prep work so your time spent editing inside the text can be more focused.


1. Summaries and Synopses

Prompt the AI to generate a detailed synopsis or chapter-by-chapter summaries so you can quickly get an overview of the material.


Example Synopsis Prompt: Provide a synopsis of this book. Include all main points and key concepts.

Claude summarizing a 149-page public-domain philosophical work

2. Supplementary Documents

Developmental editing involves tracking many different elements, as you go, page by page. The right AI tool can do this tracking for you and create documents both you and the writer may find helpful, such as:


  • Character lists

  • Setting lists

  • Plot timelines

  • Subtopic lists

  • Glossaries


Example Prompt to Create Supplementary Documents: Extract a list of settings in the book. Include a brief description of each setting.

Gemini extracting the lengthy list of settings from an obscure public domain fantasy book

Analyses to Identify Issues

Think of the problem areas authors tend to struggle with and ask the AI to analyze them. You can receive structured analyses while leaving room for your creative editorial influence and decision-making. Here are four examples:


3. Plot Analysis

If you know the plot’s intended framework, prompt the AI to fit plot points onto that template to highlight where the plot may be misaligned.


Example Prompt for Plot Analysis: Map the plot onto the Freytag’s pyramid story structure.
Follow-Up to the Plot Analysis Prompt: Explain how well the plot follows the Freytag’s pyramid story structure.
Gemini Notebook organizing the fantasy book's plot according to the Freytag's Pyramid story structure

4. Character Analysis

You can get help with determining whether the characters make quality heroes or villains, whether they’re relatable, and more. Prompt the AI about the overall strengths and weaknesses of a specific character.

Example Prompt for Character Analysis: Explain the strengths and weaknesses of the main character's arc and offer suggestions for improvement.

5. Content Gap Analysis

When working with nonfiction, you can prompt the AI to look for areas where adding subtopics could make the work feel more complete.

Example Prompt: Review chapter 3 and list subtopics the author could add or expand to make the book more comprehensive.
Gemini Notebook conducting a content gap analysis on the philosophy book

6. Structural Analysis

Structural analysis works with both fiction and nonfiction. Use AI to probe whether the structure fits the expectations of the genre and makes sense.


Example Prompt for Structural Analysis: Analyze the book's structure and list any places where the sequence of arguments lacks logical flow.


Wish you could get a quick second opinion or access your own personal fact-checker while editing? Now you’ve got one. Here are two examples:


7. Consistency Checking

If you question whether you're correctly remembering the detail that seemed unimportant when you read it days ago, ask Gemini Notebook or Claude about it. It will review the copy of the manuscript you’ve attached and answer. For this type of prompt, a simple question will work.

Example Consistency-Checking Prompt: What costume did Poppy’s mother force her to wear for Halloween?

8. Fact Checking

Comprehensive fact checking is typically outside of a developmental editor's duties, but if you need to do this, AI can help. Make sure you have web search turned on and include a request for citations so you can quickly use these sources to verify claims.

Example Fact-Checking Prompt: Fact-check this text. Include a citation for each false claim.
Claude for Word runs a fact-checking web search and includes clickable citations


9. Brainstorming

When you come across an element that could be improved, ask AI to brainstorm a list of ideas to fix the issue. They won’t all be keepers, but there will likely be a few you had not considered. Use your experience and editorial judgment to select the best option.

Example Brainstorming Prompt: Suggest plot events that could take place between chapters 3 and 4 to fill in any gaps in the timeline.
Gemini Notebook assists with brainstorming to fill in timeline gaps


You’ll have pages of helpful insights from the analyses the AI conducted at the pre-editing stage. You can use your judgment to select which are valid, put your personal touch on them, and incorporate them into your editorial feedback.


If there are any topics you may need to use careful wording with—such as suggesting the author cut a beloved character or favorite passage—you could ask the AI for guidance with explaining your reasoning. It may sound like a robot wrote it, but AI can quickly get you 80% of the way to the wording you want.

Example Feedback Prompt: Write a compliment sandwich about why chapter 7 should be cut. The first paragraph should focus on a strength of the chapter. The second paragraph should explain why the chapter should be cut. The third paragraph should focus on a positive of the chapter while maintaining the recommendation to cut.
Gemini Notebook assists with writing sensitive author feedback

What Are the Challenges of Using AI for Developmental Editing?

AI offers real benefits for developmental editing, but it also has real limitations and requires human oversight.


A common drawback is AI tends to reach for the generic:


  • Suggesting overused tropes

  • Defaulting to clichés like ending every chapter on a cliffhanger

  • Missing the mark on an author’s style, such as pushing back against experimentation in literary fiction.


The bigger limitation is that AI isn’t human. It doesn’t know what it feels like to fall in love, to grieve, to feel out of place. It doesn’t know what it feels like to be human. You do. Your lived experience is exactly why you can gauge a piece’s’s emotional resonance in ways no program can.


Your editorial judgment, emotional intelligence, and hard-won experience are more than useful to the developmental editing process; they’re irreplaceable.


When used well, AI tools like Claude and Gemini Notebook can be powerful partners to developmental editors.


AI brings its massive memory capacity and speedy analysis; you bring your creativity, empathy, and human insight that no AI can replicate. As a team, you help authors sharpen their texts, creating stronger connections and greater impact with their readers.


AI isn’t intended to replace the human editor, only to support them so they can conduct edits that are more efficient, comprehensive, and creative than ever before.


***

AI tools evolve quickly—their features, pricing, and data policies can change without much fanfare. The specifics in this article were accurate at publication. Before making decisions based on any tool mentioned here, check its website directly.





Erin Servais, founder of AI for Editors, wearing a blue suit and smiling

Erin Servais is the founder of the AI for Editors courses, the first AI training program built specifically for editorial professionals. Since launching it in August 2023, she has trained editors and content professionals from more than 20 countries, including people from Big Five publishers, Ivy League universities, US government and United Nations agencies, and major tech companies. She has presented on AI in content development for the Book Industry Study Group, the University of Chicago, the UNC Chapel Hill School of Journalism and Media, and the ConVEx conference, and she has written about AI and editing for the Editorial Freelancers Association and the Independent Book Publishers Association. Her work has been featured in Jane Friedman’s The Bottom Line and Mignon Fogarty’s AI Sidequest. A professional editor for more than 20 years, Erin is a former ACES board member and has taught copyediting at UC San Diego Extended Studies.

 

Have questions? Email Erin → Erin@aiforeditors.com


Writer: Erin Servais
Erin Servais
Jul 18, 2024
7 min read

Updated: Oct 13

A lot of concerns editors have about using AI are based on misunderstandings about what AI can and can’t do, and how AI fits into the editing process.


Lime green balance scale on a purple-and-white pedestal against a soft lavender gradient background, symbolizing fairness.

It’s normal and reasonable to worry about how AI will affect what we do as editors. But let’s base our concerns on what’s currently true, not our early experiences with AI or what we hear on the news.


In this article, we’ll tackle five enduring misconceptions so you’ll have a better understanding of how AI tools work, how they can help us be even better editors, and why they can’t replace a human editorial team.


AI Editing: Separating Facts from Fiction: Key Takeaways

  • Editors who understand how to use AI tools can do high-quality work in less time.

  • AI is not cheating; it’s just the newest tool for editors.

  • AI can copyedit in seconds, but it can’t replicate human judgment or experience.

 

Misconception 1: AI Is Not Safe to Use with Clients’ Text

There are ways to use AI tools that provide some data security. You need to know the specific policies for your AI tool of choice, however, because each is different.


For instance, in ChatGPT, training on your prompts, attachments, and AI’s responses to improve future models is on by default for personal accounts. You must go into your Settings and turn it off. Initially, Claude didn’t train on any user’s data but changed its training policies in mid-2025. Now all consumer plan users—Free, Pro, and Max—must actively opt out in Privacy Settings or their conversations may be used for training by default. Enterprise accounts for most AI platforms are automatically exempt from training.


In any case, temporary storage is required for every user, free or paid, personal or corporate. “Temporary” is a relative term that ranges from 30 days to 5 years.


Whichever tool you use, it’s wise to remove confidential or personal information from anything you upload or paste into an AI tool. You may also want to include only a few paragraphs relevant to your request instead of an entire document. And you should have your client’s or employer’s express and written permission before using any of their text with AI. Have a conversation about how you’ll use AI and the security measures you’ll take to protect their work. For freelance editors, it’s wise to also include a clause in your contract that makes it clear how you’ll use AI tools to support your work.


My Introductory to AI for Editors course has an entire module dedicated to AI ethics and privacy concerns with guidance for creating your own AI policy document.



 


Misconception 2: AI Can’t Be Trusted

For many editors, getting the facts right is part of our jobs. It’s understandable we’d be worried about earlier AI models’ hallucinations—the popular term for when AI generates incorrect information.


There has been much improvement over the years to make AI more accurate. You can expect fewer hallucinations, and you can expect it to still make mistakes.


There are several quality AI-powered research tools available now. Perplexity used to be my favorite for general use, but now all AI platforms (Claude, Gemini, Copilot, ChatGPT, etc.) can do real-time web searches, and Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM) derives its responses solely from resources you provide or select, so hallucinations are especially rare.


How do you use AI? Like using a search engine such as Google, you type in your query; but the similarity stops there. Where search engines provide lists of links with varying degrees of usefulness and reliability, AI delivers a response akin to a personalized encyclopedia entry.  


At your request, AI can also provide citations and links to sources that are top-tier outlets: research journals, encyclopedias, and trusted news organizations. This speeds up research and fact-checking immensely, which ups the trust factor with AI tools because you can see exactly where they are getting their information.

 

Misconception 3: Using AI Is Cheating

AI can handle a lot of tasks on editors’ to-do lists and vastly speed up the process. When the work is suddenly so much easier, it can feel like using AI is cheating.


Think about this: Is using spellcheck cheating? Was it cheating when you thumbed through the dictionary to find an entry because you did not have every word in the English language memorized? Was it cheating when editors moved from marking up paper to using word processors?


Editing has always been a collaborative process between an editor’s own knowledge, experience, and skills and the tools they use—style guides, reference books, and, of course, technology. AI can be seen as just another tool in the resourceful editor’s toolkit.


When you use AI, it’s offering you suggestions, but you are still the one making the decisions of which to accept, as well as which resources to trust, and which facts to verify. You are always in control, using your knowledge of what is best for the writer and the reader.

 

Misconception 4: AI Is Not a Good Editor

Multipurpose AI tools like Claude, Gemini, Copilot, and ChatGPT can absolutely conduct copyedits (straightforward checks for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style) as well as a human can. Specialized AI tools like Draftsmith are built specifically for editing work.


I’ll admit that AI is often more accurate at copyediting than I am—and it’s way faster, completing an edit in minutes that would take me hours.


I’ve found the editors who say AI isn’t very skilled haven’t learned to use the tools correctly. For example, they’ll use a vague prompt like “edit this” and then claim victory when AI doesn’t make the precise changes they want. AI does what you tell it to do, not what you want it to do. If you want it to make a precise type of change, you only need to instruct it to do so.


For instance, here is a demo of a skill (a set of reusable instructions) I wrote for Claude for Word that conducts cross-reference checks, including writing margin comments to flag and explain the errors.


a custom cross-referencing skill working in Claude for Word

AI also excels with idea generation. When you ask it to examine a particular aspect of the text and offer suggestions for improvement, it can come back with a dozen ideas, some you may have never thought of on your own. You won’t want to pass along every idea AI comes up with to the writer, but it can certainly give you good ideas and help to spark ideas of your own.

 

Misconception 5: AI Can Replace Human Editors

AI tools have come a long way. Grammarly, for example, has evolved from a grammar checker into a suite of writing agents, and new AI-powered editing tools like Draftsmith are introduced every year. These tools can catch mechanical errors, suggest improvements in grammar and syntax, and improve readability.


Even so, no AI tool is a substitute for a skilled human editor, and here’s why. 


Why AI Can’t Replace Human Editors

AI can catch mechanical errors, suggest improvements in grammar and syntax, and improve readability. But even after years of innovations, generative AI is still unreliable when it comes to nuances of language, such as irony, sarcasm, or subtle shifts in tone.


AI is trained mostly on text that follows grammar conventions, so it tends to stick with those norms. You’ll find that it struggles with allowing the creative freedom authors employ when purposefully bending or breaking language “rules.”


If editing were just fixing spelling and pushing commas around, then AI could do the job. But the role of an editor entails far more than technical correction. Editing involves a lot of soft skills.


Editors build relationships with authors. We provide personalized guidance, and we make judgment calls based on our experience, what we know about the author, and what we know about helping the author do their best work for their readers. Human editors offer encouragement and education and nurture talent.


Grammarly is not going to hop out of a computer to sit down with the author and explain to them how they can improve their writing, in precisely the way that works best for that individual author. AI tools cannot fully appreciate the cultural, historical, or personal backgrounds that shape a writer’s voice and message.


This means if editors are to surf this new technological wave successfully, we need to learn how to use AI tools so we can do our jobs faster and better than before—AI augmented, with a human in the loop and our humanity intact.

***

Let’s be real: Since it was thrust upon us at the end of 2022, AI has been a growing part of our editing lives. By learning and experiencing what AI can and cannot do, we can include it as another powerful tool in our editing toolkit.


AI can help us with the nitty-gritty mechanics of editing, speed up our research and fact-checking, and even spark new ideas for improving a piece of writing. AI can’t replace the human touch we bring—our ability to connect with authors, understand the nuances of language, and make judgment calls based on our experience and expertise.


But with AI assisting us, we have more time to focus on what we do best: helping our writers write well.

 


***

AI tools evolve quickly—their features, pricing, and data policies can change without much fanfare. The specifics in this article were accurate at publication. Before making decisions based on any tool mentioned here, check its website directly.




Smiling woman with glasses in a black-and-white portrait, wearing a blazer against a plain white background.

Erin Servais is the founder of the AI for Editors courses, the first AI training program built specifically for editorial professionals. Since launching it in August 2023, she has trained editors and content professionals from more than 20 countries, including people from Big Five publishers, Ivy League universities, US government and United Nations agencies, and major tech companies. She has presented on AI in content development for the Book Industry Study Group, the University of Chicago, the UNC Chapel Hill School of Journalism and Media, and the ConVEx conference, and she has written about AI and editing for the Editorial Freelancers Association and the Independent Book Publishers Association. Her work has been featured in Jane Friedman’s The Bottom Line and Mignon Fogarty’s AI Sidequest. A professional editor for more than 20 years, Erin is a former ACES board member and has taught copyediting at UC San Diego Extended Studies.

 

Have questions? Email Erin → Erin@aiforeditors.com

Be the first to know about courses & events.
bottom of page